The approach to monitoring and evaluation set out in Section J of the project document will be applied in accordance with GEF and UNDP requirements. In addition, monitoring and evaluation will include a post-evaluation in the third year after the completion of the Project and annual external reviews. The results of monitoring and evaluation of achievement of project objectives and activities will be channelled back through the PCU to the Steering Committee and to UNDP so as to provide a feedback mechanism for fine-tuning, improvement of delivery and response to regional and national needs.
The documents contained on this page are project monitoring reports prepared for this most part by the Project Coordination Unit. These include project quarterly reports, annual reports in formats required by GEF & UNDP and other reports prepared at critical junctions of the project.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| OFMP Annual Review 2007.pdf | 502.14 KB |
| GEF IW Results Framework_PIOFM_2007.pdf | 107.78 KB |
| GEF IW Results Framework_PIOFM_2006.pdf | 75.17 KB |
| OFMP Annual Performance Report 2006.pdf | 231.24 KB |
| 2007 OFMP Annual Review Report apprvd.pdf | 2.81 MB |
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| OFMP APR PIR 2006.pdf | 231.24 KB |
| OFMP APR PIR 2007.pdf | 316.34 KB |
| OFMP APR PIR 2008.pdf | 444.81 KB |
Introduction
THE UNDP/GEF-supported International Waters Project (IW-Project) for the Pacific Small Island Developing States (PacSIDS) has had a significant input into oceanic fisheries management and research in the Pacific Islands region. This input commenced with a Pacific SAP (Strategic Action Programme) Project (RAS/98/G32), implemented between 1999 and 2004. This project had two components: i) oceanic fisheries management and ii) integrated coastal and watershed management. The three-year oceanic fisheries management element was considered a pilot, and underpinned the successful conclusion and entry into force of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries (WCPF) Convention.
In 2004 the GEF PDF-B fund supported the design of a second SAP project, the Pacific Islands Oceanic Fisheries Management Project (OFMP), which commenced in late 2005. This five-year project is designed to assist Pacific island countries as they reform, realign and restructure their national fisheries laws, policies, institutions and programmes to take up the new opportunities which the WCPF Convention creates, and discharge the responsibilities which the Convention requires.
Purpose of the Report
The purpose of this Report is to:
[1] In the context of the project logframe matrix (Annex L) of the OFMP Project Document (ProDoc), for the three Project components
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2010-OFMP_Baseline_Study_and_Performance_Indicators.pdf | 183.57 KB |
This Mid Term Evaluation report sets out findings, lessons learnt and recommendations for the UNDP/GEF Pacific Islands Oceanic Fisheries Management Project (OFM Project). The report is developed in compliance with the terms of reference for the assignment. The conclusions and recommendations set out in the report are solely those of the evaluators and are not binding on the project management and sponsors.
Mid-term evaluations are intended to identify potential project design problems, assess progress towards the achievement of objectives, identify and document lessons learned (including lessons that might improve design and implementation of other UNDP/GEF projects), and to make recommendations regarding specific actions that might be taken to improve the project. It is expected to serve as a means of validating or filling the gaps in the initial assessment of relevance, effectiveness and efficiency obtained from monitoring. The mid-term evaluation provides the opportunity to assess early signs of project success or failure and prompt necessary adjustments[1].
The objective of the PIOFM MTE is to provide an assessment of the progress made towards the OFM project’s objectives and outputs. It should also identity strengths and weaknesses and provide an evaluation of the implementation and management of the project by identifying factors that have facilitated or impeded the achievements of the project objectives and outputs. In addition, the MTE should also provide recommendations and lessons learned to assist on defining future directions for the project.
[1] “UNDP Guidance on Terms of References for Mid-Term Evaluation Missions” Annex 1 – Standard Introduction for Mid-Term Evaluations.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Mid Term Evaluation Report_Final.pdf | 2.69 MB |
Quarterly Reports
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Q4 Report 2005.pdf | 19.68 KB |
| Q1 Report 2006..pdf | 104.57 KB |
| Q2 Report 2006.pdf | 98.29 KB |
| Q3 Report 2006.pdf | 102.56 KB |
| Q4 Report 2006.pdf | 103.25 KB |
| Q1 Report 2007.pdf | 92.08 KB |
| Q2 Report 2007.pdf | 110.72 KB |
| Q3 report 2007.pdf | 113.13 KB |
| Q4 Report 2007.pdf | 103.83 KB |
| Q1 Report 2008.pdf | 108.33 KB |
| Q2 Report 2008.pdf | 103.43 KB |
| Q3 Report 2008.pdf | 97.28 KB |
| Q4 Report 2008.pdf | 83.55 KB |
| Q1 Report 2009.pdf | 84.53 KB |
| Q2 Report 2009.pdf | 88.59 KB |
| Q3 Report 2009.pdf | 123.95 KB |
| Q4 Report 2009.pdf | 130.18 KB |
| Q1 Report 2010.pdf | 130.18 KB |